Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #1) W, , Meren te® THE Leursrans— COURT &, ZAckeD -sux A “ RZ SDwaTy ON” yy ee 7 Gri? hat vas Nor ae OF hn, TMad ff FZ.) —— EXNZ BT %y)? ed. B.S, ~ one THE eS, Dz sr. ~ Oven TAA ERRE 2, <7 Coury WesTzp . Cen he LS 2 By Bound, @ 3W DIS Tree YTsesve LN EFEIETH Sy 4-3 TT TW FED \yp 0 OTe ag iis dmv ORoMs yee Then, By. 7 ~ freae ss oF ny? hy ExT MTS, oy, ~ VEO se. "ayy ~ Choe = An, Cas ECE). 5 OF & ; Hmssa 2 e o Xe — 4) Whe +2... LLY), een ” Bez os +e 2 Ug, PSTN BET ayy, ° o _—_—_— orj> Cin ay el OF pope OU Siang, it Be The Caco Bla Te. ag ig Or The pres pe — / ” ~— ” S By g | APR eg Oe “Ses 2% oF fp: ws] wp bE pp ef ped WY AY, Dea ny. 77 (@ cl, And They, “ES2e ZB, yp yi29 THe PCoa) — COA; 7 SesT Hy; 1 Mabes —f TS Be N Ba SeJ J “Ts De, “8eding; 2— lune )_ ) 27s Ad. Mie. 7 QE Dees y Mees 77 Dada GT a7) 7 Oy). “gy Ay Ag YT es > Oxy oF Vie) Z AS Us 2 wS2zs Ly) — FSSey alry “ A. SE Bard ~S-——s 132 ~*~ @F_ : cl , S4ris J, Scr 2S 9 Sus Von o3 Ce) C 1S— -~s_ Cl-S.20/9 )r > Zs “Ds