No. 18-8909
David Lee Gentles v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1385 constitutional-violation evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule illegal-search law-enforcement-limits posse-comitatus-act search-and-seizure statutory-interpretation suppression-of-evidence
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 1385) serve as a foundation for suppression of fruits of the resulting illegal search and seizure?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Should a clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 1385), serve as foundation for suppression of fruits of the resulting illegal search and seizure? ay “l
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2019)
Attorneys
David L. Gentles
David Lee Gentles — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent