No. 18-8910

Norris Lynn Fisher v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federalism fifth-circuit judicial-accountability judicial-review rule-60b6 standing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why do the Fifth Circuit courts continue to ignore the United States Supreme Court's authoritative precedent?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION ONE: WHY DO THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURTS CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S AUTHORITATIVE PRECEDENT? QUESTION TWO: WHY DO THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURTS CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE "BINDING PRECEDENT" set BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT? QUESTION THREE: WHY ARE THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURTS not HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE FLAGRANT USURPING OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING'S & VIOLATING DEFENDANTS RIGHT'S UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? . QUESTION FOUR: .HOW CAN A RULE 60(b)(6) MOTION MYSTERIOUSLY CHANGE INTO A 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 MOTION WITHOUT ; ' [ANY] MODIFICATION [AND/OR] CHANGES MADE TO THE , MOTION? ; : See

Docket Entries

2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Norris Lynn Fisher
Norris Lynn Fisher — Petitioner
Norris Lynn Fisher — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent