Whether the Court of Appeals for the First District Texas reversibly erred when it reversed the Judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment granting the appellants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and dismissing the claims against them

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals for the First District Texas reversibly erred when it reversed the Judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment granting the appellants’ motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and dismissing the claims against them. The Court held that because the retaliatory act alleged by Jackson is de minimis and would not deter a person of ordinary firmness from further exercising his constitutional rights, Jackson has failed to raise a fact issue on his retaliation claim? -iii'