Whether a warrantless entry and search, where the totality of the circumstances indicates that exigent circumstances had occurred, or was recovering evidence inside a home violate the Constitution's Guarantees of the Fourth Amendment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED leWhether a Wavrantless ant and Seaveh, where the tobalita of He clycomstances i including facks undermining and objectiveld veagonable ballet trot onachVe emeraenta hud occurred, ov Was btcouvring ingide Uy, Goillens home violate tne Constitvobion Guarantees ot bye Foot Amendment P If 50, Should statements and Quidonce drat Weve Obtained 26a vesultofecan an onlawlul ant ve SuPPress 2 THIS 1s an issue of fst of bist imoression , OF nabioral torkance , Which Reavives this Cols attenhon. 2-Whether He Due Process clause ak Hu Fubh~ tmendment veauvedd | +e Ninth Civevit to grant an evidentard heaving onder , Franks ve Delaweve isa, Should Hit court vemwand Hit case fou de Ninth Civevit to vevidw He PetiLionev& dverlooted tssves P