Whether Mr. Stevenson was entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether Mr. Stevenson was entitled to relief, or in the alternative an evidentiary hearing, on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, where his counsel abandoned him in his appeal process? 2) Did the court error by adopting the Magistrates recommendation when Mr. Stevenson Habeas Corpus clearly fail within the one year time limit? 3) Whether Mr. Stevenson is entitled to his liberty Being the court's lost subject-matter jurisdiction? 4) Whether Mr. Stevenson is entitled to a Certificate of Appealability on each claim? 5) Whether Mr. Stevenson is entitled to every rehabilitation process as instructed by Judge Motto? 6) If the court finds that Mr. Stevenson counsel failed to file brief on Mr. Stevenson's behalf violated his First Amendment right, then Mr. Stevenson was denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal. { | | | j |