Did the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rule adversely by denying Petitioners successive writ of habeas corpus when he presented newly available evidence to the State court in accordance with Schlup v. Delo, 115 S.Ct. 851 (1995)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rule adversely by denying Petitioners successive writ of habeas corpus when he presented newly available evidence to the State court in accordance with Schlup v. Delo, 115 S.Ct. 851 (1995)? Texas made Schlup applicable to the State by codifying Schlup in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure section 11.07 section 4. ) 2. Did the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals violate the ruling made by the Supreme Court . in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) by not remanding and asking the District ” Court to decide whether or not the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence? : er 3. Should Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012) and Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S.Ct. es 1911(2013) be applicable to the Texas State District Courts in order to stop the flood of 4 federal cases addressing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel cases in Texas? . \\ .