Should pro se defendants be granted in forma pauperis status in criminal cases, given that the second copy of the record on appeal was intentionally lost by prison officials, requiring two separate prison transfers as punitive acts of egregious retaliation?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Shoul§ nm pro Se ds dendasrt Coroceeding in Permee Pa up eris In 0 criminot cose) lee, _ 9iVen OW second Co ot the. record ov\ orppend| i order -h eortect \isther direct open, : especial oh ter Prison MNiciols irhembionalh lost he original set af the recom on appeal Soring two Sepatocte. Prison. tronshens Os pueri é acts of egregious rectal ration Ve ,