No. 18-8947

Michael-Francis Palma v. Harris County Appraisal Review Board

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-amendment due-process judicial-review procedural-due-process property-rights state-judiciary statutory-interpretation substantive-due-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment SecondAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the following Due Process violations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED NOTE: In order to simplify and facilitate the courts understanding, items highlighted in yellow and the chart contained herein concerns case #2. All other elements of due process violations are the same in both cases. A right to hold, or be beneficiary to property, and be secure in one’s belongings, especially his shelter, has been held sacred by this court since its beginning. Due process consists of two types. First: Substantive Due Process which focuses on government regulation that deprives a person’s fundamental right, which is guaranteed to the person under the U.S Constitution. And second: Procedural Due Process which focuses on fair and timely procedures and may be implicated whenever the government tries to take a life, liberty or property interest of an individual. Are the following Due Process violations? 1) Is it a due process violation by a state agency to not observe basic . statutory code construction and a right recognized in a State code, the 4"" and14" Amendments' of the Federal Constitution and , FRCP 61 when substantive rights apply to property, specifically a home? (Cases #1 and 2) 2) Is it a due process violation by the state judiciary to write opinions ‘ that contradict themselves and run afoul of current state and federal case law? (Cases #1 & 2) 3) Once a petitioner, not trained as an attorney, is told that a “motion to amend petition” should have been filed, and subsequently does so, but then is denied is that a due process violation. (Case #2) Additionally: : 4) Is an American’s shelter still considered sacred as stated in Boyd v. US when an intruding foot be a government foot, “without his leave”? (Cases #1 and 2)

Docket Entries

2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-07-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael-Francis Palma
Michael-Francis Palma — Petitioner
Michael-Francis Palma — Petitioner