No. 18-8952

Boris Murphy v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2255-motion 6th-amendment conflict-of-interest deficient-performance direct-appeal due-process fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Fourth Circuit review the District Court's error in denying petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 claim de novo that was based on conflict of interest and deficient performance

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Did the Fourth Circuit review the District Courts error in denying petitioners 28 U.S.C. 2255 claim de novo that was based on conflict of interest and deficient performance in rerference to counsels direct involvement in seeking State . Death Penalty and failure to for direct appeal. , Was it a violation of U.S. Constitution 5th & 6th Amendments, where district court's abuse of discretion prejudice petitioner . by not admonishing petitioner of appellate rights in violation of due process and 6th Amendment trial rights, with couselor records coersion resulted in the plea being accepted unknowingly, involuntarily, and unintelligently.

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Boris Murphy
Boris Murphy — Petitioner
Boris Murphy — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent