No. 18-8968

Emmanuel Mathis v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process extraneous-communication habeas-corpus judicial-proceeding judicial-review juror-bias jury-misconduct remmer-hearing supervisory-power
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, as to call for an exercise of this Court's Supervisory power

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedi ngs, as to call for an exercise of this Court's Supervisory power; specifically after failing to grant Certificate of Appealability when one of the jurors in this case was a Correctional Officer at ~ the Jail where petitioner was incarcerated, and .. then accused him of masterbating over her while she ; , was a direct supervisor over petitioner ? . 2. Whether a Remmer hearing’was required in this case after the District Court failed to . interview the entire jury panel who .knew of the extreanous communication between the “tampered juror" and the nature of the communication with the person associated with the Petitioner ? 3. Whether Petitioner's Due Process rights were violated after both the district court, and the Eleventh Circuit failed to resolve all the claims presented in the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding?

Docket Entries

2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Emmanuel Mathis
Emmanuel Mathis — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent