No. 18-8969

Ronald Lunsford, Jr. v. Indiana

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2019-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment guilty-plea indiana-constitution ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-dismiss sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State of Indiana erred in denying Appellant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article One, Sections Twelve and Thirteen of the Indiana Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | Whether the State of Indiana erred in denying Appellant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article One, Sections Twelve and Thirteen of the Indiana Constitution when Defense Counsel failed to file a Motion to Dismiss prior to improperly advising Appellant to accept a guilty plea not voluntarily, knowingly or intelligently entered violating double jeopardy? . ii

Docket Entries

2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Ronald Lunsford
Ronald Lunsford Jr. — Petitioner
Ronald Lunsford Jr. — Petitioner