Whether a retrospective competency determination where mental incompetence is the impediment is permissible under AEDPA(4)(B)

No question identified. : 1 QEUSTZONS TRESENTED . . 2 Questzon */ 3 + ZS AEDPAWILE) and As determination actually a. setrospectivé . -.|— 4 |. Compebency determination whece mental incompetence 5 the imped mevit ? ‘ 6], Questzon *2 oo. 7 YI ~ Does AEDPACI)CB)* wording "created by State action” allow phe pettrbner 8 lf pave a Late violation occured (strwtural error) a5 weitten under the law ty. ot. prove. re ranged aeett exists (imentol dcomgobence ) inStead of having Yo pove 10 fhe tegediment exists going backwards in time throurh He peruse) Af medial records? 11 yo ; _12]) _Questxon 73. a . 13 |] > Does Mocen y. Godinez, 57 F3d 640 precedent geverning “cetwospectve 14 | competency determinations” also apply to cebrospechve ZMPEPIMEAT + "15 [12 determinchons within AEPPACXE) and the Ninth Ciccurts two-part test im 16 |. Bills ve Clare, Pays Placing toe borden on the prosecution ahere Petrhoner.can. ATT. prove the State achon by a fact 2 ee 18 |. . -wee 19 |I , . ; 20 {I : / . 21 II. ; 22 ; 23 |