Are law enforcement officers allowed to violate the constitutional rights of US citizens?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Under the 14th Amendment: Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America, are law enforcement officers allowed to violate the rights of United States Citizens at any time they choose and not enforce the constitutional laws that apply to citizens that were established to ensure that African Americans would receive equal treatment when seeking help because their property has been stolen and when other constitutional rights are violated and compromised by identified criminals and public officials? Are not the Chandler, AZ Police Department, Phoenix, AZ Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigations Phoenix, AZ, the Arizona Attorney General, Maricopa County Attorney, Maricopa County Sheriff, Arizona State Police, New York City Police, New York State Police, Federal Trade Commission, Indianapolis Police Department, and the United States Federal District Attorney of Arizona supposed to investigate business identity theft and copyright infringement complaints and charges against defendants when they are accused of violating the victim's rights to property, business ownership and physical safety especially when these crimes happen within their jurisdictional cities, counties, and states? Should any complaints to these police authorities be ignored whether they be verbal or in writing when copyright infringement, fraud, business identity theft, and other associated crimes happen and occur? Did Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and his deputies have the right to receive my stolen property and sell it to benefit his selected charities under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America, * when in fact he knew that the United States Federal Copyrighted product in question was a forgery and counterfeit item; and is a County Sheriff allowed to accept bribery gifts from prisoners that he has arrested and held in capitivity before and have served time in the Arizona State Department of Corrections? Isn't it proper legal procedure for the defendants to be questioned under oath without any inteference and obstruction of justice by the legal authorities who preside over the jurisidiction(s) that this legal matter of The Stolen Image "Remembering September 11, 2001" have been contacted and when pending and associated legal cases have been filed and decided upon?