Whether or not the Lower Court is talking about Petitioners Discharge and that's not what Petitioner appealed

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether or not the Lower Court is talking about Petitioners Discharge and thats not what Petitioner appealed. 2. Whether or not the United States Trustee and the Respondent Randolph N. Osherow at the 341 Creditors Meeting were talking on the phone and said "Mr.Osherow: "Okay, Mike. I'm going to conclude the meeting. You know, I extended the deadline to object to the discharge" he was talking to Mike Epstein the United States Trustee "You know, I extended the deadline to object to the discharge". This is so clear what the Trustee said by his own words, there was a previous decision and a plan that was made before the meeting to Object to Abie Wolf's Discharge. Which is documented on the Transcript from the Federal Court Reporters of San Antonio Inc. : 3. Whether or not Petitioner appealed the "Order Dismissing Trustee"s Objection To Reclassify Claim 1-1 Filed by Bonnie & Garry Starr as an Unsecured Claim and Denying Related Response and Objection by Abie Wolf and Elvis Wolf" which the Lower Court did not talk about what : Petitioner appealed and they talked about a completely different thing. 4, Whether or not the Lower Court is going by what the District Court and the Bankruptcy Court decided on which is why Petitioner appealed the Order, because they are not going by the United States Bankruptcy Rules which even the Fifth Circuit is not following the rules they are just going with the wrong information from the District Court and the Bankruptcy Court. 5. Whether or not the Lower Court is talking about the first objection dated December 27, 2016 or the second objection dated December 29, 2016 that Petitioner did not appeal and is not talking about the Order dated August 1, 2017 which is the subject of this Appeal. i