No. 18-8996
Zack Zafer Dyab v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amount-of-loss appellate-review court-discretion criminal-sentencing illegal-sentence judicial-discretion legal-error loss-calculation plain-error sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-limitation statutory-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the miscalculation of the amount of loss as applied to the sentencing guidelines represent an illegal sentence, and plain error that the Court should leave uncorrected?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1Does the miscalculation of the amount of loss as applied to the , sentencing guidelines represent an illegal sentence, and plain error that the Court should leave uncorrected? : 2 Does the Court of Appeals commit error or abuse of discretion granting a motion it has no jurisdiction to hear when the government’s motion has run afoul of the statute of limitation? i
Docket Entries
2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent