No. 18-9004

Vaughn S. Archer v. Daniel Paramo, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boykin-advisement criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-trial sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation statutory-reduction trial-court-advisement
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Archer knowingly and voluntarily entered into a guilty plea where the trial court failed to advise him as to the potential application of a statutory reduction to his sentence that was available if he exercised his right to trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether Archer knowingly and voluntarily entered into a guilty plea where the trial court failed to advise him as to the potential application of a statutory reduction to his sentence that was available if he exercised his right to trial? (2) Whether trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise Archer that, by entering a guilty plea, he was waiving a statutory reduction to his sentence that could have been applied had he exercised his right to trial? i

Docket Entries

2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent Paramo to respond filed.
2019-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Paramo
Stephanie C. SantoroCA Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Stephanie C. SantoroCA Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Vaughn S. Archer
Tracy CasadioFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Tracy CasadioFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner