No. 18-9011
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the petitioner denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was peliliover okwiecl Wis. rights Lo the Meclive ass stance ot Counse( teiad Course Could wot remember whedlar Applicant Pet trove ablzal hum to fle By Appel anol Blomm ave ly olew ie relict, ie cout! lef will iis Courls lows 2 Fucthermore, ie Teas court uneovel itucbiowslly hulled the bu tess dy the Lop | cant Pebidiowee to porbct hie ows pppoe ; oles ite hs Ebolus 06 a represented dele sdent, Williams v, Taylor 529 WS. 362, Mo L, Ed. 2h B84. Whagins vi Smith 539 US S10 Rompille v. Beard 526 US 374
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-06
Reply of petitioner Anthwaun Jordan filed.
2019-08-23
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2019-07-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2019.
2019-07-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-24
Response Requested. (Due July 24, 2019)
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Texas