Do civilly detained persons retain their fundamental rights to engage in voluntary sexual relations

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ae Do civilly detained persons retain their fundamental rights to engage in voluntary sexual relations -i.e., privacy, freedom of association, reproductive choice, and informed consent to medical treatment; and . : (a) can the "exercise of professional judgment" contemplated in Youngberg v. Romeo, . 457 U.S. 307 (1982) be used to deny such fundamental rights where there is no danger of violence; , (b) _ are said detainees entitled to a hearing to determine if professional judgment was ~ in fact exercised; : ; : (c) can said detainees refuse such professional judgment as part of their right to informed consent to medical treatment; and : (d) can said detainees be subjected to punishment or "deterrence" for engaging in voluntary sexual relations? 2. Are civilly detained insanity acquittees similarly situated to those civilly detained as incompetent and/or gravely disabled for purposes of their fundamental rights to privacy, : freedom of association, reproductive choice, and informed consent to medical treatment, and does the State need to show a legitimate and neutral, compelling governmental . interest where disparity in such fundamental rights exist? 3. Are civilly detained persons entitled to proper Due Process procedures and pre. : deprivation Due Process procedures prior to denial of their rights or privileges? 4. Can civilly detained persons be denied treatment for engaging is voluntary sexual ; relations? . 5. Are civilly detained persons entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint prior to a ruling on a motion to dismiss?