Jamaal A. McNeil v. Nebraska, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Securities
Can the Ecclesiastical Court, Letter of Rogatory, Registered Deed Poll be admissible and applied in this Writ of Certiorari
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — N | oe The petitioner would like to ask and request to the U.S. Supreme Court the question below = “ (a). Can the Eccléisastical Court, Letter of Rogatory, Register‘ . ed Deed Poll be admissible and appied in this’ herein Writ of Certiorari; (B). The Certificate of Appealability and Certificate of Probable Cause-was denied in the U.S. District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals and the petitioner would like to request and ask the U.S. Supreme Court can the Certificate of Appealability and the Certificate of Probable Cause be granted in this Court, as the petitioner has a good cause; . (C). The petitioner would like to ask and request to the U.S. Supreme Court may the petitioner expand the record and expa. nd the Certificate of Appealability in this Writ of Certiorari; (D). The U.S. District Court Clerk, did not forward the record to the U.S. Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals : did not review the record, transcripts, sealed orders, dis. . covery, and etcz:, as no receipt is shown on the docket rep-" : ort in the U.S. Court of Appeals from the U.S. District Court; (E). The U.S.@District Court judgment of dismissal Stay's suspe. nded till the U.S. Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme C, ourt judgment is over and final, and if the State exhaustion peridd is expired (which is expired) and the dismissal is still pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court, the dismissal of the judgmentby the U.S. Distr=.". ; ict Court is void’ and invalid, and the dismissal has to be i . / vacated and reversed, and the original judgment of granting the petitioners filings, have to be entered or the proceedings have to be restarted and finished, and etc.; (F)..State remedies really do not need to be exhausted as the U. . S. District Court issued a order of dismissing the case when; : (1). Intervention could of been had in the the Nebraska Supreme Court/Court of Appeals when the recall the mand7 . atewas pending; : (2). Interloctory order could of been applied; (3). Expand the record was issued, and could of been issued 4 (4). A show cause order could of been issued to the respondants; (5). Summary judgment could of been issued in (20) twenty days; (6). A second and successive motion could of been granted and ordered; (7). The dismissal order is void, due to the exhaustion ‘period being (was) expired when the dismissal order was stayed suspended till the U.S. Court of Appeals and U a , -S. Supreme Court Judgment /rehearing/mandate is final. (GY. Ruling on the new trial motion, that was sealed, is the real ruling in the Douglas County District Court, that was suppose to vacate the conviction and sentence as to; (1). Unlawful search and seizer and the fruit of the suppression hearing; (2). Violation of the petitioner's God Given Rights, vested ii Rights, Core Rights, U.S. Const. Rights, U.S. Const, Amend. Rights, Nebr. Const. Bill of Rights, Human Rights and etc.; (3). False testimony against officers in court, shown on audio and video in the discovery and in all the court pr. ceedings, as charges where filed and etc.; (4). Tax Commissioner rules and regulations where followed and applied as pursuant to the Drug Tax Stamp; ; (5). All the Tort Claims that were presented and presented herein; (6). Expungement of the Criminal History Record, of the petitioner record shall be expunge; {H).° Phe Nebraska Supreme G@éurt/Cotirt of: Appéals: filed both .Criminal Appeals(case ho# CR-16-3742 and Child Support Civil © Case together as shown on case no# S-17-1076 and A-17-1076, and shall be vacated, set-a-side, . : reversed, and recalled as the petitioner is a ward of the ‘ State of Nebraska, and the child support case will not terminate till the criminal case is terminated, and this child : support matter herein shall be expanded, amended, altered, modified and consolidated, as both of this cases shall be reverses by the U.S. Supreme Court as to the Nebraska Supreme Court/Court of Appeals recalling the ma