Does The Fourth Circuit's Widespread Practice Of Issuing Virtually Indistinguishable Production-Line Manufactured Rubber Stamped Opinions Violate Miller's 5th Amendment Constitutional Rights To Procedural Due Process And Equal Protection Under Federal Law?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Does The Fourth Circuit's Widespread Practice Of Issuing Virtually Indistinguishable Production-Line Manufactured Rubber Stamped Opinions Violate Miller's 5th Amendment Constitutional Rights To Procedural Due Process And Equal Protection Under Federal Law? 2.) Did The Fourth Circuit Violate Miller's 5th Amendment Constitutional Rights To Procedural Due Process And Equal Protection Under Federal Law When It Overlooked The District Court's Decision To Bypass, Override, Excuse The Government's Deliberate Waiver Of Non-Jurisdictional Arguments, As Explicitly Prohibited By This Court In Wood v. Milyard, 132 S.Ct. 1826 (2012)? ; 3.) Did The Fourth Circuit Violate Miller's 5th Amendment Constitutional Rights To Procedural Due Process And Equal Protection Under Federal Law When It Overlooked The District Court's Failure To Adjudicate Or Resolve All Of Miller's 28 U.S.C. §2255 Habeas Claims, As Required By The Fourth Circuit Itself In Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694 (4th Cir. 2015) And This Court's Ruling In Gelboim v. Bank Of Am. Corp., 135 S.ct. 897 (2015)? . i