Maurice Edward Carter v. Mike Parris, Warden
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decision to deny Mr. Carter's habeas corpus relief misconstrued meritorious unresolved factual claims from the lower court(s) of constitutional violation of the law considering the nature of the crime
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Petitioner’s locked box was seized and searched illegally, and was not based . a on well-founded probable cause that must be supported by a reasonable, articulable : suspicion of criminal activity? . Il. Whether Petitioner was questioned, arrested illegally, and warrants read to him without administering Miranda rights? : I. Whether Petitioner’s Trial Counsel/Appellate Counsel was ineffective for reserving an improper non-dispositive certified question of law, neglecting to do the proper investigation of law when reserving a dispositive certified question of law that ; prevented him appellate review. T Y Page .