No. 18-9022

Maurice Edward Carter v. Mike Parris, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-violation fourth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel miranda-rights probable-cause search-and-seizure sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decision to deny Mr. Carter's habeas corpus relief misconstrued meritorious unresolved factual claims from the lower court(s) of constitutional violation of the law considering the nature of the crime

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Petitioner’s locked box was seized and searched illegally, and was not based . a on well-founded probable cause that must be supported by a reasonable, articulable : suspicion of criminal activity? . Il. Whether Petitioner was questioned, arrested illegally, and warrants read to him without administering Miranda rights? : I. Whether Petitioner’s Trial Counsel/Appellate Counsel was ineffective for reserving an improper non-dispositive certified question of law, neglecting to do the proper investigation of law when reserving a dispositive certified question of law that ; prevented him appellate review. T Y Page .

Docket Entries

2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent Mike Parris, Warden to respond filed.
2019-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Maurice Edward Carter
Maurice Edward Carter — Petitioner
Maurice Edward Carter — Petitioner
Mike Parris, Warden
John Henry Bledsoe IIIOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John Henry Bledsoe IIIOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent