Did the District Court err by not granting an evidentiary hearing to address Constitutional Violations

No question identified. : QUESTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITE STATES PRESENTED. , 1. Did the District Court err by not granting an evidentiary hearing to address 2 Seventeen (17) Constitutional Violations of gross structural errors? 2. Did the Fourth Circuit Court err by not granting certificate of appealability After evaluating the issuses in defendent petition that show merit enough to hold A evidentiary hearing. 3. Did the State Court fact finding procedure adquately Provide a full and fair hearing? T.T. Nov,8,1996. pg. 157, at 7. statements By officer Sulivan concerning another crime sceen witness. 4. Did the prosecutor; Commit a Brady Violation concerning DNA Blood testing evidence? T.T. Nov,13,1997. . Pg. 11, at 4-21. 5. Did the prosecutor commit a Brady Violation by withholding a Witness statements at trial that was favorable to the defendant case? Andre Robinson Statements speaking about another suspect that commited the crime. T.T. Nov,8,1996. , Pg,157, at 7. 6. Isstriai counsel constitutionally ineffective by not objecting To the statements of the trial judge instructions to the jury ‘concerning the, Mind state of intent? see. Brown v. Keane 355,F.3d.82,87. 2d. Cir.2004. . 7, Is the issuses of errors in this case structural or plain error by the Cronic Standard, US. v. Cronic 466, US.645. 1984. 8. Is the State denial of petitioner Second post status a right of entitlement or due process failure by the States Post Conviction Act of 1995. see. Gardner v. US. 680 F.3d.1006. 7th.Cir.2013. US. Fed. Appx. 159. 2017. General Assembly of Maryland Article 27-645-A. (a)2~-1-(a) 11. FN7-FN8. 9. Was the trial judge in err by not declaring the trial, Void because of two felones being on the jury during deiveration. see. evidentiary Hearing, see, T.T. Jan,28,1997.pg.8. lines 4-8.°10. ISstrialijudge in err to aquit On two lesser counts and allowed the jury to deliverate on only the count Of First Degree Murder. see. MD. Rule ~ 758 (a). Sherman v. (2.) Protection Clause and the state of Maryland enactment of the amended post 3 Conviction Procedure Act of 1995, allowed a defendant two full post conviction By State Rule Article 27 § 645-A (a)-(2) that a person may not file more than 2° Petitions for relief under this subtitle and the enactment of the amended Post Conviction Procedure Act of 1995, was not to be applied retroactively To those who were convicted prior to Oct,1,1995.see; State v. Marvin Williamson 408, Grayson v. State Amended By Ch.258. Acts of 1995. Oct,1,1995. 2. ; I. History of Case. On Nov,14,1996. a jury in the Circuit Court of Batimore City found ReeD guilty Of First Degree Murder and carrying a concealed weapon. On Feb.11,1997. Reed, Was Sentenced to Life Imprisonment on the First Degree Murder Charge, with a Consecutive Three yrs. on the weapon offense. On Dec,17,1997. The Court Of Special Appeals of Maryland affirmed, Reeds conviction and sentence to issued The Mandate on Jan,16,1998. Reed did not pursue further Reed judgment of conviction became final for the purpose of direct appeal on Feb,2,1998. Because of Reeds Attorney imforming him to not file a writ of, Certiorari to this appeal and to use this issue on post,that it was normal Procedure. see, MD. Rule 8-302. On Feb,12,2003. Reed filed a petition for, Post Conviction Relief in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, which was Denied on Oct,14,2004. Reed filed an application for leave to appeal. the, Court of Special Appeals denied it and issued the mandate on June,9,2005. , On June,27,2006. Reed filed his first motion to reopen post conviction proceedings The Circuit Court of Baltimore City denied that motion on Aug,30,2006. However, Reed could not file for leave to appeal because he was placed in MCAC.Supermax Without any personal property including his legal transcripts and court papers (4) see.Lochild ReeD v. Secretary of Public Safety. Circuit Court of Baltimore City — . Case No. 24-C-08-000547. Reed was found not guilty in all investigati