Whether a conviction based on an unconstitutional sentencing enhancement can be overturned under this Court's decisions in Apprendi and Alleyne

No question identified. : so TABLE OF Cont RW ty Quepfoas Presented For Revlew. Lecce eee ent ee eee pel Le of Parctes Tn Count Below. 0 eee rr ere ee Table dt Machori tes CMe. eee wane Pol Con tution, Seer, Regal MN 03 and Raley Let P: 1. Chatleas of Ipinturpand Orders Pn eye. 0a. eee ph Turisdictional Statemenpes nace antes tose tees aa p-3 Congattustiaal Provistaas And Statutes La Volvej..--==. ee ? : Steageereng Fh The Cade eres ce cg cae e teense ee eee Counse UF Proceeding Ee the Cae New Before ThE Count. -f-l Relevant Pacts Concer ning The Underlying Cunwictlon.+to eeP 7 Existence OF qucis Uetton Below. 0 eee wap 8 The Japreme Court Ob Karras Hes Decided A Federal Questten Fa & Way Da Conflict With The Appltcable Decision of We Caurte eee ~e ew pd At gunmen Fur A\lowance OF Wet. 00 Le eee eine eae Aa ( te Supreme Court OF Kansas Rered BY lletermint ng Not to Gree This Counc lectrien Reeroaceve Bkkee ee ee ~ 2th Prading Misleading ard Coarce2 Skatemengs At The Trial OF the Cafeeree sence tee seek te te ne pd The Questions Rars ed La this Kee Lerportan¢ And Uatep ved . « ~. \4 Conclugten-. 2. 2 eee ee ee we eH nee ee pS Cersihpate. ot fervice_ 2 — ~~~ 2 ee tre opty YI y (i) PRE L1LeoN FOR CERTIORART QURSTTONS PRESENTEO POR REVEEW 1. May a coavierion based dA a unconsereagional herd 50 lke Sentence be yyerturaed ut day ~<ive yay ahis Courts decks conte ApPrendé a5 to what Consiieutes tenpreper ap ward Lepargure Sentence be applied 40 ais en Sq? ; sy AWS covets decision in Aleyne a5 to whee Conspanes Terproper vp ward departure Sentence be applted te 4toactiy ely £9 Set aside the coavictiin ta chis cage 2 LIst of PAQTLES 4N COURT BELow DEREK SCHMIOT Attorney Gereral \L0 S.Woth Aye. 8 Plooe Topeliq, Wp. WuhiboSWERYL L. LEOT WCE ASST Sane Or saeicg Attorney of Wyaa dette Wunry T\o N. 14% Street Kansas Risa, ey Wate { TA GLE 5t AutHoR ttt ES CXTEQ Meyer Ve uated Sates, 570 U5. 99, 133 $4 UST U5 by, Wh bk Ba-vh BA Qoy)).. ceeuse eet geet ee eects =f HN Hepptends VNew darsey F3o UT AWG ATL BA-LL43S, 19 $c L3AFGoce)-p GYD Rlaltely Ve Washinggen, FAL US. HAL, LFA LBALd M3, VAS CAR Gop. 12 Q) | Qibsen Ve United Fates LT BL VAT rl US. App: LExrs SPU, . pooi Ped App-O8PFp ~~p.ld Pepper Vetted Feetes, Fur UF ATE! -Stage Ve Conley 16 Kane a, Mt f.33 WdrQsve)-. seem re mene ~p-le : An _ pelt Saco: Hurt 18 Kan. bru, tol P.3b249(r904) ae P SataceV. Janes, 374 Han 354, 194 PIS UT, L90F Han LAXTS 14P.. pd ETSAEN Cas Share Ve MOP, LTT Wan eT, 83 P33 1LiQ(904) en eee pi Mared Sates Ve CeookedAtoys 2 53 R3g lbs ol WS. Ape LEXPS bro DUT WE BLE D2 cee en a — CONSTL TUTION, STATUTES, REGULATIONS and RULES Sty Amendment go the United States Conrtheutrun fequifes chat gautantees crtmingl defen dang the right AD & § peedy and pablic pial by a4 impartial yey a\feo gautaarees them the night <0 he tohormed of che charges, «he ctght of conkrorntadin ot advenie WKAR SES, aha right to w35e Precels a compel the Xtfen dance dt wrtacsses for che Lebense and che Myht <0 corarel A le ne with che Rfah Nerendment to Tacterge a Seateace beyond she man dq ter doubt an fact CITATIONS OF OPINTINS AIO ORDERS INCASE : “The original Conviction of Pegagtoner tx Wangas Coty Keaasgs Wyandotte County was ref reporsed, but ty Set Porth a4 PP-7-1F of che