Whether the petitioner's disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act was violated by suppression instead of protection

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED SO 1-Petitioner is disabled on both physical and.mental. Suppressed on disabled petitioner instead of protected as the American with Disabilities has recommended was violated to the American with Disabilities Act? 2-Protected for American white who had unlawful actions and suppressed onto Asian victimization is racial discrimination? | | 3Judges, aomeys: and doctors who are licensed by Colorado State and executed under Colorado Laws; they stood together and suppressed on Asian and they have ability to make a predictable what will happened | to by their connivance is violation of Civil Rights , 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983, 1985, 19862 4By the experience and legal comprehension of judicial officer, by experience and scientific study of lawyer and medical doctor; what happened to the asthma patient must be living on this contamination, pollution environmental? 5. The analysis and evaluation by the doctors of National Jewish Hospital shown was involved to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease but | doctors imputed to the cause by smoking related, was the violation to ethical professional and medical malpractice under federal statute such as ADA? 6Exploited the impairment of disabled on the purposed protected for white Defendants are violated to the 42 U.S.C. 1981(c)? 2 . , ; 7By wrongful actions when executed power of judicial officer and acted under state actor is classified as acted under color of state law? And violated to the 42 U.S.C. 1981 (a) 8In petitioner opinion, the U.S. Constitutional was constituted basic on philosophy morallity; was the defendant in violation to the U.S. Constitutional rights when were acted unethical. 9Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is disability under the American with Disabilities Act? Why petitioner is asthma and COPD patient but must live in this unhealthy environmental since 06/2015 to present? 10Petitioner was injured by this contamination and air-pollution; with. : significantly evidences. Why hearing and trial pursuant to the 7” and 14" Amendment had not been proceeding? : 11Evidence is proves for wrongful action, and basic on evidence judge can conclude that is guilty or not guilty, | liable or not liable. This claim has clearly, richly evidences. Why judges engulfed and not respected to the “rule of evidence” 12Doctor did do the correction on pulmonary tests of Asian with purposed to protect for the White respondent; were doctor was in racial discriminated? 13Petitioner had submitted the evident of contamination and air-pollution to doctors of the Metro Community Provider Network (MCPN); instead truly referred to National Jewish Hospital with corrected situation of contamination and airpollution; doctor Michael Nguyen and Physician Assistant Meghann DeVito referred and addressed on “debris” at crawlspace; were doctors of MCPN , ' violation to the ethical professional and racial discrimination when doctors created a path for defendant evade from liability? And purposed to protect for white Defendants? | 14Petitioner had been living under contamination and air-pollution since the day move in this condo on 03/20/2015 to present. Defendants with wrongful action but | they’re under patronage of judges; were this a system discrimination? 15After lawsuit filed, Red Sky Condominium HOA leaves a trashed around petitioner condo since the 2015 to present. Were this condition proved for retaliation, harassment and discrimination under category of ADA? and violated to the Civil Rights? 4