Valerie Arroyo v. Joseph Colbert, Jr., et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess Jurisdiction
Did the lower tribunal, federal or state court, federal or state agencies, or employees' actions, conduct or interference were unconstitutional through deprivation the color of the law, the Plaintiff's civil right, deprivation the color of the law, and due process during two judicial proceedings?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . I. _ Did the lower tribunal, federal or state court, federal or state agencies, or employees’ actions, conduct or interference were unconstitutional through deprivation the color of the law, the Plaintiff's civil right, deprivation the color of the law, and due process during two judicial proceedings? 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and 42 U.S.C. § 1988; 18 U.S.C. § 241, 18 U.S.C. § 242 Il. _ Did the lower tribunal or state court decision conflict with the importance of federal questions, or failure to act appropriately according to the 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and 28 U.S.C. § 1343, Ill. Did the lower tribunal or state court interference; decisions violate or deprive the Plaintiff's right to exercise any of the Amendments of the Bill of Rights of the United States? IV. Did the federal tribunal, state court, or state agencies, or employees of United States Agency actions, conduct, or interference violate the Petitioner’s civil rights, or deprive the color of law in the original Court? V. Did the federal tribunal, state court, or state agencies, or employees’ actions, conduct or interference violate the Sovereign Immunity Act? 2