Whether the court of appeal's decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a Motion to Vacate under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (i) Whether the court of appeal’s decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a Motion to Vacate under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. ' Gi) Whether the court of appeal’s decision below adversely affects the public’s perception of the unbiased nature of the judiciary when a substantial burden is placed on litigants to be granted recusal relief from a clearly biased judicial officer. (ii) What impact will belie litigants where a biased judge, contrary to the independent functions of the judicial system, issues ruling(s) that should be set aside based upon an undisclosed financial interest or demonstrated Fraud Upon the Court?