Whether a federal court must grant an evidentiary hearing and findings, contrary to Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 (1963)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I WHERE A PEDERAL LovRT muse OAT AN ; ENO Ea AR HEARMG AND MEMES, 16 TRAT OPPOSITE OF TOW SEND Vv, SAL, 378 US 343 (1443) ° AT , 5 aye _ . T Neen ee HE ARNG PRAL CouRrT Deemay = CESS RRY FoR PET Toe _ ; ImoedER To tO PET Gonek TO HMVE Invest GATOR SAPELY PROCEED TO TRAC ws TRAL 3. Der = . ; : . a rOmER OF ERS WEAR AND CONV IM ena G Proo€ os — TO Re BST DE GSE Lounset REPRE SEMTATION 6” TO Tt Cooks. hoes THAT Gon stitutes ReAU A Pa : _ UPON TRE Covet ? . ro A OMBEL AF USC Faasd VQ), PET Monee oehers CLEAR AMO CONVIRNOMG Prove TO ReEO&STE LoReECT= MESS OF TRAL covkT LE CORO 1E ADERAL CURT ADO prs STATE ARGOWENT with MO Ofek of prod WAS TAT CLEAR ERROR?