No. 18-9050

Roland Kailihiwa v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment canine-alert contamination drug-detection drug-detection-canine expert-testimony probable-cause residual-odor search-and-seizure search-warrant training
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Mervin's positive alert on a parcel shipped to Hawaii, given his unsophisticated training and the possibility of contamination, suffices to establish probable cause to issue a warrant to search the parcel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Police trained Mervin, a drug-detection canine, to alert on minimal residual odor. In accord with that training, Mervin often alerted on parcels containing no contraband drugs, which police officers, testifying as experts, opined was most likely explained by the parcels having been contaminated by residual drug odor on their way to Hawaii. Such proximity, this Court has held in other contexts, does not give rise to probable cause. The question presented here is whether Mervin’s positive alert on a parcel shipped to Hawaii, given his unsophisticated training and the possibility of contamination, suffices to establish probable cause to issue a warrant to search the parcel.

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Roland Kailihiwa
Peter Christian Wolff Jr.Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Peter Christian Wolff Jr.Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent