No. 18-9054

Sandra Forquer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2019-05-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts court-procedure dismissal due-process equal-protection legal-remedy maryland-court-of-appeals replevin replevin-action writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Maryland Court of Appeals erred in denying the Petition for Writ of Certiorari regarding the improper dismissal of the Petitioner's Verified Replevin Action

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the: a. Maryland Court of Appeals erred when they denied accepting a Petition for Writ of Certiorari regarding the improper dismissal of the Petitioners Verified Replevin Action in the lower courts. b. Cireuit Court of Harford County, Maryland misinterpreted a decision from the Maryland Court of Special Appeals (“COSA”) in order to dismiss the Petitioners Verified Replevin Action that was on appeal from the District Court of Maryland for-_ Harford County. 2. Whether the lower courts violated the Petitioner's right to Due Process and Equal Protection under the law by denying the Petitioner access to the courts for a remedy. The Petitioner’s Writ of Certiorari in the Maryland Court of Appeals was unopposed by the Respondent, yet the court denied the petition. LIST OF ALL PARTIES. The Petitioner is Sandra Forquer, a living, natural woman, and is a resident of the state of Maryland. Respondent is Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a for profit commercial corporation operating and doing business in the United States of America. It is defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1603, as a separate legal person, an association, a limited liability company, and a foreign state, and they are subject to U.S.C. Title 15 Commerce and Trade and the Uniform Commercial Code.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2019-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)

Attorneys

Sandra Forquer
Sandra Forquer — Petitioner
Sandra Forquer — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Daniel Z. HerbstReed Smith, LLP, Respondent
Daniel Z. HerbstReed Smith, LLP, Respondent