Does the fact that the Appellant was arrested and questioned in Canada immunize the United States Attorney from following the Constitution of the United States of America, the Bill of Rights (specifically the Fifth Amendment), and established Supreme Court precedents when applying United States statutes Extra-territorially when no express Extra-territorial component is explicitly expressed by Congress, especially since multiple circuits continue to disagree on the proper execution of the application of Extra-territorial jurisdiction and Constitutional protections when an individual is charged and tried for a crime in the United States and when all aspects of the alleged crime occured entirely within the sovereign territory of a foreign nation?

Question Presented ° Does the fact that the Appellant was arrested and questioned in Canada immunize the United States Attorney from following the Constitution of the United States of America, the Bill of Rights (specifically the Fifth Amendment ), and established ; Supreme Court precedents when applying United States statutes Extra-territorially when no express Extra-territorial component is explicitly expressed by Congress, especially since multiple circuits continue to disagree on the proper execution of the application of Extra-territorial jurisdiction and Constitutional protections when an individual is charged and tried for a crime in the United States and when all aspects of the alleged crime occured entirely within the sovereign territory of a foreign i nation? 4 . Page a