Whether petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is governed by the applicable test of Strickland v. Washington

No question identified. : ( (City, State, Zip Code) | ee (Phone Number) S)PRESENTED av ny: lag colashor she wanted Sku Beshnct Court reall Dohid Flite , : A S10 ‘Ss Comvary to tHe Federok rate set Ou q tye US Supreme Court— AK they Failed rniewd Counsels acho under reasonableness loefore the court found hat deferre Coianse ls 2) Wheeler Strategic decisin OF de Leng Counsel Lens Unton sh tut ood in Pirro di 4) AS i+ UnLived “Petitioners fun damental cane hav rights g Querantetd by dus prouss Clauy chicd pote cts ON AlCUSed during a Criminad POLI ding 2) Whe +hyr Pet toners Claim of ineffechve, Counse {| is Aeverned by app lad teyt of Strick land “vv ly ict en Crone, 4) whe tres Petthuner ex enhtled ty atPrmetive, wiplicit acu ptuny of defense Counce g SMa teqy