Where the State Court conducted a hearing and the party was 'denied due process of law in the proceeding

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where the State Court conducted a hearing and the party was "denied due process of law in the proceeding", does 42 U.S.C. § 2254 (e) obviate the need for federal hearing on undeveloped facts? . ; Does the THIRD CIRCUIT DISTRICT COURT'S decision, not to grant a hearing, conflicts between subsequent decisions of Federal Courts of Appeals and the SUPREME COURT.Z ; ; ’ re ; PARTIES OF THE PROCEDING : ; The petitioner in this case is Peter Rojas, pro se. All of the respondents are Mark Capozza, SCI Fayette’s Superintendent and Christine F. Muphy, Esq. for respondent. , , ii | “ .