Is the ban against West Virginia prisoners' receipt of catalogs and of internet documents excessive and overly broad under the First Amendment's free speech clause?

No question identified. : QUESTION (S) PRESENTED Prison officials withheld mail addressed to prisoner : Dennis Rydbom; such mail being (1) an Edward R. Hamilton book catalog, and (2) a National Academy of Science report on. eyewitness identification printed from the internet. Prison officials incorrectly described the internet document aS "book(s), newSspaper(s), or magazines(s) not ' received directly from the publisher 'COPIES NOT ALLOWED, '" received from Steven Saines, and costing $1.89 to mail out. Prison officials and the lower courts refused to explain how withholding Rydbom's mail was reasonably related . to legitimate penological objectives. . 1. Is the ban against West Virginia prisoners' receipt of catalogs and of internet documents excessive and overly broad under the First Amendment's free Speech clause? — 2. Does the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process clause require prison officials to give a prisoner a reasonably honest and accurate description of seized mail along with a valid penological reason for withholding a particular catalog or internet document, so the prisoner can knowingly and intelligently decide whether to accept/dispute such seizure? 3. Must a federal court actually state how withholding a prisoner's mail is “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests" when dismissing a prisoner's civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim? LI F PARTI : All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all