No. 18-9069

Hector Rengifo v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-court-split civil-procedure controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense court-of-appeals due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment standing supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-winstead
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether two United States Court of Appeals has entered a decision in conflict with relevant decision of this Court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether two United States Court of Appeals has entered a decision in conflict with relevant decision of this Court. ; _. 2. Whether Pennsylvania's statute for Delivery, Manufacture or Possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance is broader than the U.S.S.G. definition of a "controlled substance offense."! 3. Whether counsel was ineffective under the Sixth Amendment for failing to raise a legal question of law. _ : 4. Whether the Court of Appeals ignored Petitioner's Addendum in the light of “f United States v. Winstead to deny a Certificate of Appealability. : i PARTIES TO’ THE PROCEEDING AND

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Hector Rengifo
Hector Rengifo — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent