Whether the district court abused its discretion in failing to properly determine that Mr. Sanchez's proposed witnesses had a valid Fifth Amendment privilege to assert

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the district court abused its discretion in failing to properly determine that Mr. Sanchez’s proposed witnesses Nino Tanzini and Shawn House had a valid Fifth Amendment privilege to assert? Il. Whether section 401(a)(2)(A)(i) of the First Step Act of 2018 applies to Mr. Sanchez’s case, pending on direct appeal pursuant to section 401(c). Whether his sentence should be vacated and remanded for resentencing under the reduced mandatory-minimum provided for in the Act?