No. 18-9073
Maurice Grayton v. California, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure civil-rights disability-discrimination due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction fraud rooker-feldman-doctrine standing state-court-proceedings third-party
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Takings DueProcess
SocialSecurity Takings DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state bar examination process violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by discriminating against a disabled veteran-examinee
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | ‘
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Maurice Grayton filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-02
Waiver of right of respondents California, et al. to respond filed.
2018-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)
Attorneys
California, et al.
Robert G. Retana — The State Bar of California, Respondent
Robert G. Retana — The State Bar of California, Respondent