No. 18-9075

Ponce D. Howard v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure conflict conflict-of-evidence declaration-conflict declarations investigation investigation-findings magistrate-judge procedural-review summary-judgment workplace-policy
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Magistrate Judge, District Court, and Eleventh Circuit misapply summary judgment principles by not addressing the conflict between the declarations and the investigation findings?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case for the United States Court for the Middle District of Alabama, the District Court, and the Eleventh Circuit statements in the declarations of Paschel and Smith in support of Howard’s opposition by not addressing the conflict of the declarations with the findings of the investigation by HMMA that Howard violated its’ workplace policy misapply fundamental summary judgment principles. i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-24
Waiver of right of respondent Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama to respond filed.
2019-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 31, 2019)

Attorneys

Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama
David James MiddlebrooksLehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, PC, Respondent
David James MiddlebrooksLehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, PC, Respondent
Ponce D. Howard
Ponce D. Howard — Petitioner
Ponce D. Howard — Petitioner