No. 18-9083
Ken Gryder v. Laura Rudy, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights county-taxation defamation-claim dmv-registration due-process employment-damages free-speech malicious-prosecution patent prosecutorial-misconduct sovereign-immunity standing takings unlawful-eviction
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the issues raised in the SCOTUS petition for writ of certiorari are properly presented
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-24
Waiver of right of respondents Laura Rudy and Shawn Kimmitz to respond filed.
2019-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent Richard Holcomb to respond filed.
2018-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Ken Gryder
Ken Gryder — Petitioner
Laura Rudy and Shawn Kimmitz
Sharon E. Pandak — Greehan, Taves & Pandak, PLLC, Respondent
Richard Holcomb
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent