No. 18-9087

Donald Durrant Farrow v. Erik A. Hooks, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech government-overreach jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Perini & Denim Menswear denied access to the courts when Perini was described as a 'Domestic Terrorist'?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Ws THE Perini & DENIM MmenlanE ta ACCESS Ta THE Coukls WH Wes Peritiny vias Desoitsdd 4.5 OS . CL TMi GseWE AF UVOD THECHON 2) Was THE Aritulee, DGD ovRloota A marti Fars FL ay) Exception. /ipey | ov on Oe LECH. Dok boss, yl BA! LUM Ins Cesttget Eieceptun MMf9 Tan Hehaang ZV TH ORY Ah ““277/ Zupuiy Gy mez 4 Gros NUANKM , 3) WAS THE Perm Dent Ltpal iteden LUE FECES, Chquse, WHEN Lsn7T ar. , Sebyl FiahTS AS&§ SHWPES WINES LP Cppps, POR ( SZBTBWENE” MADE 70 LD Fiat, ETT no (ANC Police DepiMnT wy! Was Perrine ARKTOATT OF INN CIC Sweep yn aq,

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Donald Durrant Farrow
Donald Durrant Farrow — Petitioner
Donald Durrant Farrow — Petitioner