No. 18-9088

Charles W. Gray v. Indiana

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2019-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment indiana-constitution ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State of Indiana has erred whether Petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the State of Indiana has erred whether Petitioner received ineffective . assistance of counsel in violation of his the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article One, Sections Twelve, Thirteen and Twenty-three of the Indiana Constitution? IL. Whether the State of Indiana has erred whether Petitioner, was deprived of effective assistance of Appellate Counsel in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article One, Sections Twelve and Thirteen of the Indiana Constitution when Appellate Counsel failed to raise every possible error? ~ d i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Charles W. Gray
Charles W. Gray — Petitioner
Charles W. Gray — Petitioner