No. 18-9091
Antwayne Tremayne Lowry v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review certificate-of-appealability criminal-conviction due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-vacate sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial and appellate court erred in denying Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ISSUE 1: Whether the trial and appellate court erred in denying Petitioner’s Motion for Certificate of Appealability? 3 PrefixIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2018 ANTWAYNE LOWRY, PETITIONER, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT The Petitioner, ANTWAYNE LOWRY, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgmentorder of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on January 30, 2019.
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Antwayne Lowry
Arthur L. Wallace III — Suite 400, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent