Joel Marvin Munt v. Eddie Miles, Warden
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Should a COA have been issued?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1. Should a COA have been issued? 2. Do inmates lose all constitutional rights merely because : actions were taken in the guise of prison discipline no matter how pretextual? 3. Can prison officials prevent any redress for violation of those constitutional rights. maintained by inmates merely by doing so under the pretext of prison discipline and then ensuring that they cannot file for relief while in SEG? 4. Should Sandin v. Conner be re-evaluated? 5. Did the combination of the “in custody” requirement, Court Doctrines regarding Mootness, the Exhaustion Requirement and Heck’s favorable determination requirement act in concert to / unconstitutionally suspend the privilege of writ of habeas corpus and right to petition the government for redress for a large class of claims (virtually all claims resulting from unconstitutional prison discipline) regardless of how : blatantly the Constitution was violated, what the lasting effects are or how likely the violations are to be repeated? 6. Was the Petition for Writ of Habeas corpus moot? 7. Do Constitutional Restrictions apply to Prison Disciplinary Rules? 8. Was the Discipline Retaliatory? Joel Marvin Mant