No. 18-91

Antoinette Pizzino v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd., dba Norwegian Cruise Line

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: actual-notice common-law constructive-notice cruise-line cruise-lines dangerous-condition maritime-law maritime-negligence negligence negligence-standard notice notice-requirement premises-liability
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a plaintiff in a maritime negligence case should be required to show defendant's actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition when the plaintiff would have no such obligation under common law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether, in cases where a defendant or its agent has created the dangerous condition that causes injury, a plaintiff in a maritime negligence case should be required to make a separate showing that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition when the plaintiff would have no such obligation under the common law? li PARTIES AND

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent NCL (Bahamas), Ltd. to respond filed.
2018-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)

Attorneys

Antoinette Pizzino
Elizabeth Koebel RussoRusso Appellate Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Elizabeth Koebel RussoRusso Appellate Firm, P.A., Petitioner
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
Curtis J. MaseMase Mebane & Briggs, P.A., Respondent
Curtis J. MaseMase Mebane & Briggs, P.A., Respondent