No. 18-9101

Pierre Montanez v. Ursula Walowski

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-05-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-jurisdiction federalism judicial-regulation judicial-review peremptory-challenges separation-of-powers standing supremacy-clause supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Environmental
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the subject of peremptory challenges are valid under the Separation of Powers, Due Process, and the Supremacy Clause

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : Sh ches Liles Repene Curd Role YB) oR! Separation of ( Pawrer3, cle process, aol Me Sepremacy Cheuve in Wal A hos Ya! thal the Sebjeed of Perenptaey Chellnges are vmdk % Pe. fedtcia! Corr | : %s , regulate, Cow rary Yo Vhe jurispructuce oS oP hs nt in Ress x Oklahoma, Sui vs Mooma, , : © Milsons v, Uwitleg) Sees , cud Has es v. Miss sue: : yp | was a QW awswered in Whe aWorralive, 1S mois Sepwme Cah Bk BY wal > [-] All parties appear in the eaption ‘of the ease on the coverpage, oe © VAAN parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Allistof: 9 °° “>. |.» .allparties'to:the proceeding in the court whose. judgment is the subject ofthis. | Sa de Pree Montasez — AY rower Be Se 5 tthale: Upiene Gand, he Bagh of the Kloof Twos ee ee

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Ursula Walowski to respond filed.
2019-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)

Attorneys

Pierre Montanez
Pierre Montanez — Petitioner
Pierre Montanez — Petitioner
Ursula Walowski
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent