No. 18-9102
Michael Bazan v. Robert Whitfield, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process evidence excessive-force qualified-immunity standing
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's Excessive-Force claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; . DWos Qelitione’s HH When telly Vlas DOA Tre Couck OC Aveedls Err Ta benvina Rebbiover's Excessive Force. VA Tree Couck DEMQveAS Convodly Revrenstvidence In lal Mast Eavovalsbe. Des Redd over Roised A Canine ssue Congti— LManal Bald iow Maobed THT ee vihence une Viewed Tlic WactFauorale “To Whe Noveiadina Mekal?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-31
Waiver of right of respondents Robert Whitfield, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Whitfield, et al.
Matt Douglas Matzner — Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, LLP, Respondent
Matt Douglas Matzner — Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, LLP, Respondent