Whether the Eleventh Circuit failed to properly apply Title 18 U.S.C. Section 922(e)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FAILED TO PROPERLY APPLY TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 922(e) IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH GUILT? Il. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FAILED TO PROPERLY APPLY RULE 16, FED.R.CRIM.P. BY ALLOWING IMPROPER EXPERT TESTIMONY AFTER THE GOVERNMENT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOTICE? Il. WHETHER SENTENCING ERROR WARRANTS REVIEW? i INTERESTED PARTIES Counsel for the Petitioner, Kurt Zamor, certifies that the following persons and entities have or may have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Pannayotta Augustin-Birch, Assistant Federal Public Defender; 2. Peter Birch, Assistant Federal Public Defender; 3. Honorable Dave Lee Brannon, U.S. Magistrate Judge; 4, Wilfredo Ferrer, United States Attorney; 5. Honorable Daniel T.K. Hurley, United States District Judge; 6. Tan Goldstein, Esq., Defense Counsel; 7. Honorable James M. Hopkins, U.S. Magistrate Judge; 8. Lothrop Morris, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 9. Richard L. Rosenbaum, Esq., Appellant Counsel — Zamor; 10. Emily Smachetti, Assistant U.S. Attorney; 11. Kurt Zamor, Defendant. li