No. 18-9105
Samuel Eugene Geddie v. North Carolina
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-crimes alleyne-precedent alleyne-v-united-states court-of-appeals criminal-classification criminal-law due-process north-carolina north-carolina-law sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the North Carolina Court of Appeals erred by holding there are 'no aggravated crimes' in North Carolina, when the Supreme Court has held in Alleyne v. United States that there are
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The Question Presented is; I. WHETHER THE NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY HOLDING THERE ARE “NO AGGRAVATED CRIMES”, SUCH AS AGGRAVATED COMMON LAW ROBBERY, IN NORTH CAROLINA, WHEN THIS COURT HAS HELD IN ALLEYENE V. UNITED STATES, 570 U.S. 99, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L. Ed. 2d (2013), THAT THERE ARE?
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent STATE Of NORTH CAROLINA to respond filed.
2019-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
SAMUEL GEDDIE
STATE Of NORTH CAROLINA
Daniel Patrick O'Brien — NC Department of Justice, Respondent
Daniel Patrick O'Brien — NC Department of Justice, Respondent