Whether the lower courts erred in failing to order the respondent to show cause and provide indictments, trial transcripts, habeas corpus, and all proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED GRoun D ¥ ONE WHEATHER TRE LOWER COURTS ERRED IN : Falling to oRdDER THE RESPONDENT +o Show CAUSE And PROVIDE. LNDOIctments, TRIaL . TRiaL TRANSCRIPTS, Habeas CORPUS , and all PRoceedinGS with ORDER of the STATE Courl olseissions ALL APPELLate, BRIEFS With the OPiNion oP the APPELLATE CouRTS, Qs Was ORDERED to do SO) Is the Denial OP Rotihoners Due PROcESS OF LAW ?? GRound * Twa, WHERTHER the LOWER CourTS ERRED in failing Address Politoners Claim In Tat His Counsel. had Rendereo ConstituTlonally Ineffective AssisTance , wm Failing to File. ann Reguest a hearinG on the RoAttioners Timely Filen MoTiaw TS With DRaw his Guwlty Plea algo not to Pursue. Pettoner's APPEAL ReQuesT Denied PetitioneR DUE PRocess of LAW EQual PROTECTION of LAW ane Ineffective. ASSISTance2¢ GRouno* THREE eae WHEATHER The Lowe COURTS ERRED in Failing to address Petitioners Claim in that the TRial dudee Failed to hear or RULE. on Petitioner's Timely Filed Motion to WHh draw his Guilty Plea a denial oP Que. PROCESS and EQual. PROTEET ION OF LAW 2? WHEATHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED In FAILING to addeess Petitioners mistaken or FRaudu Lent Indic MENTS in the *CR83-0742 Where there We VALIO Sworn Testimony [nok] TRANSCRIPT of GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 0@ MINUTES In SuPORT OF SaMe Denial. of Petitioner's DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION oF the LAW and Pitioners Fith Amendment RIGHTS ? ¢ | -2 .