No. 18-9109
Jose Christian Nunez-Belemontes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-order constitutional-violation criminal-procedure criminal-proceeding dea drug-enforcement-administration due-process notice opportunity-to-be-heard title-21 title-21-usc-841 title-21-usc-841a
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is an administrative order conclusive and in violation of constitutional due process without the administrator providing notice and opportunity to be heard?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Is An Administrative Order Conclusive And In Violation Of Constitutional Due Process Without The Administrator Of The Drug Enforcement. Administration Who Reports Any Violation Of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) To Any United States Attorney For Institution Of A Criminal Proceeding, Without Giving The Person Appropriate Notice And Opportunity To Present His Views, Either Orally Or In, With Regard To Such Contemplated Proceedings Volative Of The Defendant's Due Process. i
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent